Delay Application ....................................... for any Appeal / Application - basic requirement ...
- Any appeal or any application may be admitted after the prescribed period , if the appellate or applicant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making application within such prescribed period .
- Sufficient cause ... the appellate or the applicant was misled by any order , practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may be sufficient cause .
- Right to appeal is statutory right it cannot be deprived only on ground of delay so Sufficient Cause should be given liberal construction so as to advance suitable justice .
- Negligence of an Advocate is sufficient cause to condone delay .
- Differing legal advice by different advocate could be sufficient cause to condone delay .
- Mistake of an advocate is also sufficient cause to condone delay .
- Length of delay is however , no matter - explanation for delay is the only criteria for condonation of delay .
- Every day's delay must be explained does not mean that a pedantic approach should be made .
- Application for condonation of delay may be filed even after filing of an appeal or application .
- In Delay application appellate or applicant may claim Interim Relief like Stay/Injunction etc which is necessary for ends of justice .
............ Relevant Provision ...................
- Section 5 of The Limitation Act 1963.
- Order 41 Rule 3A of Civil Procedure Code 1908.
====== Relevant Judgment ==========
- Bhivchandra Shankar More v/s Balu Gangaram More & ors 2019 SAR 632.
- K. Subbarayudu and Others v/s The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition ) 2017 SAR 1003 = (2017) 8 SCALE 61.
- Perumon Bhagvath Devaswom Perinadu Vill v/s Bhargavi Amma (Dead) By Lrs & Ors A.I.R.2009 S.C.(Supp) 886= 2008 SAR 790.
- Manoharan v/s Sivarajan & Ors 2014 SAR 23.
- N. Balakrishnan v/s M. Krishnamurthy A.I.R.1998 S.C.3222.
- Sonabai Kerappa Katkarb v/s Mohamad Jilani Mohmad Washid Shaikh 2008(6) All.M.R.323= 2008(5) Mh.L.J.411.
- Suresh G. Ramnani v/s Aurelia Ana Da Piedade Miranda alias Araiyo Alvares 2012(5) Mh.L.J. 40.
- Bhausaheb Hiraman Makale v/s Laxman Shankar Gaikwad 2012(1) Mh.L.j. 168.
- Pratapchand Lakhamaji Jain v/s Smt. Lilabai Krishanath 1998 (3) Mh.L.J. 706.
- Vinodkumar v/s Kailaskumar Makhanlal Chaudhari 2011(1) Mh. L. J. 269.
- Shaikh Ibrahim Jan Mohammad v/s Tekchand Rathod 1986 Mh.L.J.902.
......... Please peruse/read Previous Blogs & comment give suggestion for better development of next Blog.....
No comments:
Post a Comment